Michael Moore Capitailism a Love Story Review Essay Example for Free

Michael Moore Capitailism a Love Story Review Essay The film Capitalism: A Love Story is a documentary by Michael Moore which outlines the negative effects capitalism has on modern society. Moore points out that capitalism gives people the opportunity to make a lot of money and to have a high standard of living. However, for many workers, making an income to support a family can be quite impossible. At one time, you could find a secure job and live a good life, but capitalism has evolved into a system of greed where only the rich get richer, and the middle class get poorer with no chance to better themselves. This review will analyze the positive and negative impacts of capitalism shown in the film, as well as provide my comments as to why I enjoyed the film. Capitalism gives us the freedom to do what we want and to make what we want of ourselves. It gives one the opportunity to work as much or as little as one wants, and to have the ability to make more money than others. At one time, if you worked hard, you could make a lot of money, and you could purchase a house, cars and many material possessions for yourself and your family. One could argue that even today, with a good education and a secure job, one could enjoy the benefits of a good life. Thus, corporations provided jobs, infrastructure and security for its employees and subcontractors. However, corporations have evolved and will continue to evolve. In some cases, modern companies have evolved positively where they can profit and, at the same time, treat all employees including CEOs fairly. Some such businesses are run democratically by all the workers, who also own the company, because they have an equal say and vote in the running of the operation. These worker-owned companies, such as the bread company in California, provide a good income for all their workers. The employees share equally in the profits, and profit sharing is not dependent on the position one holds. One owner commented that the more hours one works toward the benefit of the company, the more one shares in the profit. Detrimentally, many corporations have evolved negatively where the CEOs are only concerned about filling their own personal pockets with increasing profits and not caring at all about the well-being of their employees. Michael Moore eagerly points out the negative impacts capitalism has on society. Capitalism no longer provides people with the long-term sustainability needed to support themselves and their families. A good example of this is when Moore speaks out about his hometown of Flint, Michigan, and the GM plant where most of the citizens worked. When the automotive company shut down, the workers lost their jobs, and they had nowhere to turn for money. Moore alluded the reason the plant shut down was for the CEOs’ benefit because they were trying to make more profit, while not giving a second thought for the welfare of the people of Flint. As a result, many families lost their homes, and Flint became an abandoned city. Capitalism does not care about the average person because it is a system where corporations compete for higher profits and more benefits for the rich CEOs. If the GM plant in Flint was planning to close, and there was any regard for its employees, why was there no effort made to retrain employees with skills needed for other jobs so that they could continue to support their families and debts? In fact, CEOs of large corporations lobby and influence government policies to permit special tax cuts and bonuses allowing corporate officials to make more money, and in return, greedy government officials also benefit by receiving corporate favours and benefits. Thus, Wall Street and government officials help fill each other’s bank accounts.

Essay --

An authentication plan is the validation of a user identity against an authentication provider, which is a directory or database that contains the user’s credentials and can attest the utilizer submitted them correctly. An example of an authentication provider is Active Directory Domain Accommodations (AD DS). Other terms for authentication provider are user directory and attribute stores. An authentication method is a concrete exchange of account credentials and other information that assert a user identity. The result of the authentication method is proof, typically in the form of a token that contains claims, that an authentication provider has authenticated a utilizer. An authentication type is a categorical way of validating credentials against one or more authentication providers, sometimes utilizing an industry standard protocol. An authentication type can utilize multiple authentication methods. After a utilizer's identity is validated, the sanction process determines which sites, content, and other features the utilizer can access. Your Planning for utilizer authentication t...

Political Competence Essay

In almost any affair that involves multiple stakeholders the idea of partnership and collaboration have essential roles. This is also applicable in building a strong society or country especially since it is composed of numerous people with varying needs that must be addressed. In relation to this the concepts of good corporate citizenship and political competence are vital in giving the necessary services to the people. Corporate citizenship pertains to â€Å"a new contract between business and society, a vision of partnership between different sections of community, which allies profitable companies with healthy communities because what happens to societies happens to business† (Benchmarks, n. d. ). On the other hand, political competence involves skills and attributes that make it possible for the achievement of organizational goals (Wells, n. d. ). Good corporate citizenship and political competence are related because these are interdependent upon each other. In order for good corporate citizenship to make successful partnerships it needs political competence that will make sure that the plans they made will be properly applied so that their objectives can be realized. Since the past up to the contemporary time, the government plays an important role in the organization, information dissemination, budgeting, and funding of a country’s healthcare system. The government is the primary body that is responsible in passing laws for the planning as well as the implementation of various concerns regarding the healthcare system of the country. This is greatly observable in countries like the United States of America, states in the European Union as well as in other parts of the world. However, this kind of system is not always as effective as it seem to be. There are still many people who lack the proper healthcare attention, which is always the reason that there are various sicknesses that most citizens suffer from. The main problem why such incompetence takes place is due to the lack of political will coming from the government and also the improper and sometimes illegal contracts that are happening among the public agencies and corporations. This could be seen in the common practice that is observable in the distribution of the needed medicine for most healthcare centers. Government funded organizations are responsible in commissioning private corporations in buying the needed medicinal paraphernalia. Nevertheless, anomalies often happen in this kind of dealings. Corrupt government officials would allot a huge amount of budget in order to buy medicinal necessities but this money is not consumed for this sole purpose. Some of it tends to fall in the pocket of officials who are only thinking of their vested interests. They would engage in illegal contracts with private corporations who would also gain benefit in the process (Messerli, 2008). This kind of issue is clearly an ethical dilemma that needs to be address immediately. A good solution for this problem is to create an objective, independent body that would see to it that the budget allotted for the healthcare of the citizens are use for the right purposes. This is one good way in order to do something to prevent this kind of anomaly from happening. The healthcare of citizens is a very important aspect of an individuals’ right, which is why it should be given due attentions and importance.

In A Stunning Victory That Defied Universal Expectations,

In a stunning victory that defied universal expectations, Donald J. Trump won the majority of Electoral College votes to become the elected 45th president of the United States on November 8, 2016. Consistent with his exuberant campaign promise to act swiftly to â€Å"repeal and replace† the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (â€Å"ACA†) his first act as President was to begin the process of dismantling the controversial health care reform law that throughout the campaign, and over the six years since the law passed, Republicans in Congress had vowed to completely repeal. The President’s executive order did not come with a replacement plan. Today the GOP and President Trump are well past the second month of his presidency and apart from†¦show more content†¦Prior to the Affordable Care Act, infamously known as Obamacare, health care was free market for profit system with both the pharmaceutical and health insurance companies firmly ensconced i n the driver’s seat. The ACA is a wide sweeping health reform law enacted in March 2010 by former President Barack Obama. In addition to shifting health care from treating the sick to focusing on promoting health, Obama’s health care law attempted to control costs by reducing Medicare payments to hospitals and insurers, as well as encouraging doctors to use teamwork to keep patients healthier by reforming both private and public health insurance systems. Pre-ACA private insurance companies that administered Medicare Advantage plans had been receiving, on average, 14 percent more for providing the same services that traditional Medicare does. The ACA ensured Medicare stopped overpaying insurance companies, doctors and hospitals. With enactment of the ACA all Americans who complied had access to government sponsored affordable healthcare including those already covered by Medicare. The law allows people up to age 26 to stay on their parents’ health insurance plans. Pre-ACA the working poor were less likely to have insurance because their jobs didn’t offer it and private premiums were not affordable. With ACA many middle- and low-income Americans get some or all of their insurance